A legendary paladin sword glowing with divine energy, forged from radiant silver with intricate gold inlays. The blade is long, slightly curved, and etched with ancient runes that shimmer with celestial light. The crossguard is ornate, shaped like angelic wings, and adorned with a blue sapphire at its center. The grip is wrapped in sacred white leather, bound with golden filigree. The pommel features a radiant sun emblem, pulsing with holy power. The entire sword exudes a divine aura, glowing faintly in a darkened cathedral with beams of light shining down. The style is highly detailed, realistic, and inspired by epic fantasy art, with intricate textures and a majestic presence.

Discover a breathtaking fantasy paladin sword, glowing with divine energy and adorned with intricate gold inlays, celestial runes, and angelic wings. Perfect for epic fantasy art, game assets, or AI-generated imagery inspiration.

Paladin Sword Prompt

A sleek, curved dagger-like sword with an obsidian-black blade, etched with glowing red runes that shimmer faintly in the dark. The blade is lightweight yet deadly, designed for swift, precise strikes. The hilt is wrapped in dark leather, with intricate silver inlays forming the sigil of an ancient rogue guild. A hidden mechanism within the guard allows for a sudden flick of a concealed secondary blade, perfect for assassins. The pommel features a small, enchanted gemstone that pulses with a soft, eerie glow, hinting at its magical properties. The entire sword exudes a sense of stealth and mystery, perfect for a master rogue who thrives in the shadows. The background is a dimly lit, foggy alley or a moonlit forest, reinforcing the sword’s stealthy nature

Discover a stunning AI-generated fantasy rogue sword—an obsidian-black blade etched with glowing runes, a stealthy assassin’s weapon with hidden mechanics and enchanted details. Perfect for dark fantasy and RPG lovers!

Rogue Sword Prompt

# Academic Research Papers Summarization Prompt

## Background & Context
Academic research papers are formal documents that present original research findings, methodologies, and conclusions in specific fields of study. They are primarily created by researchers, scientists, and academics at universities, research institutions, and laboratories. These papers are consumed by other researchers, students, academics, industry professionals, policymakers, and practitioners who need to stay current on advancements in their fields. Academic papers serve to advance knowledge, document discoveries, validate theories, and contribute to the scholarly conversation within disciplines.

## Report Structure & Components
Most academic research papers follow a standardized structure that includes:

1. **Title and Abstract**: Concise overview of the paper's purpose, methods, and findings
2. **Introduction**: Background context, research gap, problem statement, and research questions/objectives
3. **Literature Review**: Summary of existing related research and theoretical framework
4. **Methodology**: Research design, data collection procedures, experimental setup, and analytical approaches
5. **Results/Findings**: Presentation of data, statistical analyses, and empirical evidence
6. **Discussion**: Interpretation of results, implications, limitations, and connection to existing literature
7. **Conclusion**: Summary of key findings, theoretical and practical contributions, and future research directions
8. **References**: Citations of all sources referenced in the paper
9. **Appendices**: Supplementary materials, raw data, or detailed procedures (when applicable)

## Critical Information to Extract
Focus on extracting and highlighting the following key elements:

1. **Research Question/Objective**: The central problem or hypothesis being investigated
2. **Key Contribution**: What new knowledge, theory, or method the paper introduces
3. **Methodology Summary**: Critical aspects of the research approach, sample size, and analytical techniques
4. **Primary Findings**: The most significant results and whether they supported the hypotheses
5. **Theoretical/Practical Implications**: How the findings advance the field or apply to real-world contexts
6. **Limitations**: Important constraints or weaknesses in the study design
7. **Future Research Directions**: Suggestions for subsequent studies or unanswered questions
8. **Novelty Factor**: What distinguishes this research from previous work in the field

## Stakeholder Priorities
Different stakeholders need different aspects emphasized:

1. **Researchers**: Focus on methodology rigor, theoretical frameworks, and research gaps addressed
2. **Students**: Emphasize clarity of concepts, methodology explanation, and connections to foundational theories
3. **Industry Professionals**: Highlight practical applications, actionable insights, and business implications
4. **Policymakers**: Stress societal impact, policy implications, and evidence-based recommendations
5. **Educators**: Note pedagogical implications and teaching applications
6. **Grant Reviewers/Funders**: Emphasize innovation, impact potential, and alignment with funding priorities

## Output Format Guidelines
Structure the summary in approximately 500-750 words with the following components:

1. **Meta Information** (1-2 lines): Paper title, authors, publication venue, year, DOI if available
2. **Executive Summary** (2-3 sentences): The most important takeaway from the research
3. **Research Purpose** (2-3 sentences): Clear statement of objectives and research questions
4. **Methodology Overview** (3-5 sentences): Key aspects of the research design and approach
5. **Key Findings** (5-7 bullet points): Principal results and their significance
6. **Implications** (3-5 bullet points): Theoretical contributions and practical applications
7. **Limitations and Future Directions** (2-3 sentences): Notable constraints and next steps
8. **Relevance Assessment** (2-3 sentences): Evaluation of the paper's contribution to its field

## Special Considerations
1. **Discipline-Specific Terminology**: Be aware of field-specific jargon and conventions; provide brief explanations for highly technical terms when summarizing for interdisciplinary audiences
2. **Statistical Reporting**: When reporting statistical findings, include effect sizes and significance levels when available
3. **Methodological Paradigms**: Recognize different research traditions (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods) and their unique evaluation criteria
4. **Citation Impact**: If available, note citation metrics or journal impact factors to indicate influence
5. **Emerging Research**: For cutting-edge topics, contextualize how the paper fits into evolving research trends

## Common Challenges
1. **Technical Complexity**: Academic papers often contain complex statistical analyses and discipline-specific terminology that must be translated into more accessible language
2. **Variable Quality**: Research papers vary greatly in quality, clarity, and contribution; the summary should reflect this assessment
3. **Methodological Diversity**: Different fields use vastly different methodologies requiring appropriate evaluation frameworks
4. **Theoretical Density**: Some papers are heavily theoretical and require careful unpacking of abstract concepts
5. **Length and Structure Variations**: While most follow standard formats, some journals and disciplines have unique structures that require flexible summarization approaches

## Sample Output Structure

---

### RESEARCH SUMMARY: [Paper Title]

**Authors:** [Names] | **Published:** [Year] in [Journal/Conference] | **DOI:** [number]

**Executive Summary:**  
[2-3 sentence distillation of the paper's most important contribution and significance]

**Research Purpose:**  
[Clear statement of what the researchers aimed to investigate and why]

**Methodology:**  
[Concise explanation of research design, participants/data sources, and analytical approach]

**Key Findings:**
* [Finding 1]
* [Finding 2]
* [Finding 3]
* [Additional findings as needed]

**Implications:**
* **Theoretical:** [How this advances understanding in the field]
* **Practical:** [Real-world applications or policy implications]
* **Methodological:** [Any innovations in research methods, if applicable]

**Limitations and Future Research:**  
[Brief discussion of study constraints and suggested next steps]

**Relevance Assessment:**  
[Evaluation of the paper's contribution, quality, and importance to its field]

---

Transform complex academic papers into clear summaries with our AI prompt - perfect for researchers, students, and professionals needing quick insights from scholarly articles.

Academic research papers Summarization Prompt

# Clinical Trial Results Summarization Prompt

## Background & Context
Clinical trial results reports are official documents that detail the outcomes, methodology, and findings of clinical studies testing medical interventions (drugs, devices, procedures, etc.) on human participants. These reports are typically created by pharmaceutical companies, academic research institutions, or contract research organizations (CROs). They are consumed by regulatory authorities (FDA, EMA, etc.), healthcare professionals, investors, patient advocacy groups, and other researchers. These reports serve as the scientific foundation for regulatory approval decisions, clinical practice guidelines, and future research directions.

## Report Structure & Components
Clinical trial results reports typically include:
1. Study overview and trial identification (NCT number, protocol ID)
2. Study design (randomized, blinded, controlled, etc.)
3. Participant demographics and baseline characteristics
4. Inclusion/exclusion criteria
5. Intervention details (dosing, administration, duration)
6. Primary and secondary endpoints/outcome measures
7. Statistical analysis methodology
8. Efficacy results (primary and secondary endpoints)
9. Safety and adverse event data
10. Statistical significance calculations (p-values, confidence intervals)
11. Subgroup analyses
12. Discussion of results and limitations
13. Conclusions and implications

## Critical Information to Extract
Focus on extracting:
1. Trial identification (name, phase, NCT number)
2. Study population size and key demographics
3. Study design (randomized, controlled, blinded, etc.)
4. Treatment arms and interventions tested
5. Primary endpoint results with statistical significance
6. Key secondary endpoint results
7. Safety profile and significant adverse events
8. Statistical methods used and their appropriateness
9. Any notable subgroup analyses or exploratory findings
10. Study limitations and potential biases
11. Authors' conclusions and recommendations
12. Funding sources and potential conflicts of interest

## Stakeholder Priorities
Different stakeholders need different aspects emphasized:

**Regulatory authorities:**
- Methodological rigor
- Complete safety profile
- Statistical validity
- Protocol adherence

**Healthcare professionals:**
- Clinical significance vs. statistical significance
- Number needed to treat/harm
- Applicability to real-world patients
- Comparison to standard of care

**Investors/executives:**
- Market potential implications
- Competitive positioning
- Timeline to potential approval
- Risk/benefit profile

**Researchers:**
- Methodological details
- Statistical approach
- Gaps requiring further study
- Comparison to related trials

## Output Format Guidelines
Structure the summary as follows:
1. **Executive Summary** (2-3 sentences highlighting key findings)
2. **Trial Overview** (study design, population, interventions - 1 paragraph)
3. **Key Results** (bullet points for primary and important secondary endpoints)
4. **Safety Profile** (concise summary of notable adverse events and safety signals)
5. **Limitations** (bullet points of key limitations affecting interpretation)
6. **Implications** (1-2 paragraphs on significance for clinical practice, regulatory pathway, or future research)

Use precise medical terminology but explain specialized concepts. Include actual numerical data (percentages, p-values, confidence intervals) for key outcomes.

## Special Considerations
- Distinguish between statistical significance and clinical relevance
- Note the phase of the trial as context for interpreting results (Phase I-IV)
- Highlight any discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes
- Be precise about the nature of endpoints (surrogate markers vs. clinical outcomes)
- Consider the generalizability of results to broader populations
- Interpret p-values and statistical tests appropriately
- Identify potential biases in study design or reporting
- Note whether the trial was completed as planned or terminated early
- Be attentive to industry-funded studies and potential reporting biases

## Sample Output Structure

**EXECUTIVE SUMMARY**
Study XYZ, a Phase III randomized controlled trial, demonstrated that Drug A reduced mortality by 25% compared to standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with statistical significance (p=0.003).

**TRIAL OVERVIEW**
- Trial ID: NCT01234567, CLARION Study
- Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III trial
- Population: 782 adults with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer, ECOG 0-1
- Intervention: Drug A (500mg daily) vs. placebo, both with standard chemotherapy
- Primary endpoint: Overall survival at 12 months

**KEY RESULTS**
- Primary endpoint: 12-month overall survival was 65% with Drug A vs. 52% with placebo (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90, p=0.003)
- Secondary endpoints:
  * Progression-free survival: 8.3 vs. 5.1 months (HR 0.68, p<0.001)
  * Objective response rate: 42% vs. 29% (p=0.01)
  * Quality of life: Significant improvement in FACT-L scores (p=0.02)

**SAFETY PROFILE**
- Most common adverse events: Fatigue (45% vs. 30%), nausea (38% vs. 35%) 
- Serious adverse events: 18% in Drug A arm vs. 12% in placebo arm
- Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events: 7% vs. 4%
- Treatment-related deaths: 2 (<1%) vs. 1 (<1%)

**LIMITATIONS**
- Underrepresentation of elderly patients and those with ECOG ≥2
- Median follow-up of only 14 months may limit long-term safety assessment
- Single biomarker (PD-L1) used for stratification
- 15% crossover rate may have diluted survival difference

**IMPLICATIONS**
Drug A demonstrates clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival with a manageable safety profile for advanced NSCLC patients. These results suggest Drug A could become a new standard-of-care first-line therapy for this population. The benefit appears most pronounced in patients with high PD-L1 expression, indicating potential for biomarker-guided treatment selection. Regulatory submission is planned for Q3 2023, with potential approval expected mid-2024.

Clear summaries of clinical trial results - transform complex research into accessible insights for healthcare professionals and patients.

Clinical trial results Summarization Prompt

# Customer Feedback Surveys Summarization Prompt

## Background & Context
Customer feedback surveys are systematic tools used by companies to collect opinions, satisfaction levels, and suggestions from customers about products, services, or overall experiences. These reports are typically created by customer experience teams, market research departments, or third-party research firms. They are consumed by multiple stakeholders including product managers, marketing teams, customer service leadership, executive management, and operational teams who implement changes based on customer insights.

## Report Structure & Components
Customer feedback surveys typically include:
- Survey methodology (sample size, timeframe, collection method)
- Demographics of respondents
- Quantitative metrics (NPS, CSAT, CES scores)
- Rating scale responses (e.g., 1-5 or 1-10 scales)
- Categorical data (product lines, service types, customer segments)
- Open-ended responses/verbatim comments
- Comparative data (against previous periods or benchmarks)
- Cross-tabulations by customer segments
- Statistical significance indicators
- Response rate information

## Critical Information to Extract
When summarizing customer feedback surveys, prioritize:
- Overall satisfaction scores and key metrics (NPS, CSAT, CES)
- Significant trends or changes from previous periods
- Top positive themes from qualitative responses
- Primary pain points or areas for improvement
- Specific product/service areas receiving notable feedback
- Demographic or segment-based variations in satisfaction
- Actionable insights that suggest clear next steps
- Statistically significant findings
- Urgent issues requiring immediate attention
- Voice of customer examples that illustrate key themes

## Stakeholder Priorities
Different stakeholders need different insights:
- **Executives**: High-level overview, business impact, strategic implications, competitive positioning
- **Product Managers**: Detailed feedback on specific features, prioritized improvement areas, customer needs
- **Marketing Teams**: Brand perception, messaging effectiveness, competitive differentiators
- **Customer Service Leadership**: Service quality indicators, training needs, process improvement opportunities
- **Operations Teams**: Specific process failures, efficiency opportunities, quality control issues
- **UX/UI Teams**: Usability feedback, navigation issues, interface improvement suggestions

## Output Format Guidelines
Structure the summary as follows:
1. **Executive Summary** (1-2 paragraphs highlighting major findings and business implications)
2. **Key Metrics Dashboard** (visual representation of critical metrics and their trends)
3. **Major Insights** (3-5 bullet points of the most important discoveries)
4. **Emerging Themes** (categorized positive and negative feedback areas)
5. **Segment Analysis** (notable differences across customer segments)
6. **Action Recommendations** (3-5 prioritized suggestions based on feedback)
7. **Voice of Customer** (2-3 powerful verbatim quotes that represent key themes)

Recommended length: 1-2 pages for executive consumption, with an optional detailed appendix.

## Special Considerations
- Be mindful of sample size and statistical significance when reporting findings
- Distinguish between correlation and causation in customer behavior analysis
- Consider response bias (typically more extremely satisfied or dissatisfied customers respond)
- Note differences between explicit feedback (what customers say) and implicit feedback (behavioral data)
- Be aware of recency bias in customer responses
- Consider industry-specific terminology and expectations (e.g., HCAHPS for healthcare, ACSI for retail)
- Account for cultural differences in how ratings are provided in global surveys

## Sample Output Structure

# CUSTOMER FEEDBACK SURVEY SUMMARY: [PRODUCT/SERVICE NAME] - [TIME PERIOD]

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
[1-2 paragraphs synthesizing key findings, trends, and business implications]

## KEY METRICS
- Overall Satisfaction: [Score] ([change from previous period])
- Net Promoter Score: [Score] ([change])
- Customer Effort Score: [Score] ([change])
- Response Rate: [Percentage] ([change])

## MAJOR INSIGHTS
• [Key insight 1]
• [Key insight 2]
• [Key insight 3]
• [Key insight 4]

## WHAT CUSTOMERS LOVE
• [Positive theme 1]: [Brief explanation + data point]
• [Positive theme 2]: [Brief explanation + data point]
• [Positive theme 3]: [Brief explanation + data point]

## IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
• [Negative theme 1]: [Brief explanation + data point]
• [Negative theme 2]: [Brief explanation + data point]
• [Negative theme 3]: [Brief explanation + data point]

## SEGMENT HIGHLIGHTS
• [Customer segment 1]: [Key differentiated feedback]
• [Customer segment 2]: [Key differentiated feedback]
• [Customer segment 3]: [Key differentiated feedback]

## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. [Specific, actionable recommendation 1]
2. [Specific, actionable recommendation 2]
3. [Specific, actionable recommendation 3]

## VOICE OF CUSTOMER
"[Powerful customer quote illustrating a key theme]" - [Customer type]
"[Powerful customer quote illustrating a key theme]" - [Customer type]

Craft clear, actionable summaries from customer survey data with AI assistance. Get insights faster and improve decision-making with expert analysis.

Customer feedback surveys Summarization Prompt

# Competitive analysis documents Summarization Prompt

## Background & Context
Competitive analysis documents are strategic intelligence reports that evaluate an organization's competitors in the marketplace. These reports are typically created by market research teams, competitive intelligence specialists, product managers, or strategic planning departments. They are consumed by executives, product teams, marketing departments, sales teams, and R&D units to inform strategic decision-making, identify market opportunities, and anticipate competitive threats. The goal is to provide actionable insights about the competitive landscape to maintain or improve market position.

## Report Structure & Components
* Executive summary
* Industry overview and market trends
* Competitor profiles (for each significant competitor)
  * Company background and market position
  * Product/service portfolio analysis
  * Pricing strategies
  * Distribution channels and market reach
  * Marketing and positioning strategies
  * Customer base and target segments
  * Financial performance metrics
  * Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis
* Comparative analysis across competitors
  * Feature/capability matrix
  * Pricing comparison
  * Market share data
  * Performance benchmarks
* Gap analysis (comparing the organization to competitors)
* Strategic recommendations
* Appendices with supporting data and research methodology

## Critical Information to Extract
* Major competitive threats and their implications
* Key market differentiators for each competitor
* Significant market share shifts and trends
* Pricing position relative to competitors
* Product/service advantages and disadvantages compared to competitors
* Competitor strategies and their likely next moves
* Market opportunities based on competitor gaps
* Competitive advantages that should be leveraged
* Vulnerabilities that require strategic response
* Priority recommendations with supporting rationale

## Stakeholder Priorities
* **Executives**: High-level competitive positioning, major threats, strategic implications, and actionable recommendations
* **Product Managers**: Detailed feature comparisons, pricing strategies, and product roadmap implications
* **Marketing Teams**: Positioning strategies, messaging differentiation, and target segment analysis
* **Sales Teams**: Competitive talking points, objection handling, and win/loss analysis
* **R&D/Innovation Teams**: Technology gaps, innovation opportunities, and competitor development pipelines
* **Financial Analysts**: Performance metrics, market share trends, and financial implications

## Output Format Guidelines
Structure the summary as follows:
1. **Executive Brief** (1-2 paragraphs): Highest-priority insights and implications
2. **Competitive Landscape** (3-5 bullet points): Key market position and trends
3. **Top Competitors Analysis** (3-5 bullet points per major competitor, covering strengths, weaknesses, and strategies)
4. **Comparative Assessment** (a small table or matrix highlighting key differentiators)
5. **Strategic Implications** (3-5 bullet points on threats and opportunities)
6. **Recommended Actions** (3-5 prioritized recommendations with brief rationale)
7. **Critical Metrics to Monitor** (3-5 key indicators to track competitive position)

Use clear, concise language with industry-specific terminology as appropriate. Include callouts for especially significant findings.

## Special Considerations
* Maintain objectivity and avoid overly positive or negative characterizations without supporting evidence
* Distinguish between verified facts and analyst opinions/projections
* Consider the recency of data when summarizing and note when information may be outdated
* Be aware of industry-specific metrics and KPIs (e.g., SaaS companies use different metrics than manufacturing)
* Note when competitive intelligence may be incomplete and identify key information gaps
* Consider regional differences if the analysis covers multiple geographic markets
* Be mindful of the difference between direct competitors and adjacent threats/potential market entrants
* Acknowledge potential regulatory or market changes that could alter the competitive landscape

## Sample Output Structure

# COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY: [INDUSTRY/SEGMENT]

## EXECUTIVE BRIEF
[1-2 paragraphs synthesizing the most critical competitive insights and implications for the business]

## COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
* Current market structure: [key insight]
* Recent market shifts: [key insight]
* Emerging trends: [key insight]
* Our position: [key insight]

## TOP COMPETITORS

### Competitor A (Market Leader)
* Core strengths: [bullet points]
* Key vulnerabilities: [bullet points]
* Strategic direction: [bullet points]

### Competitor B (Rising Threat)
* Core strengths: [bullet points]
* Key vulnerabilities: [bullet points]
* Strategic direction: [bullet points]

## COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT
| Dimension | Our Company | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|-----------|-------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|
| Price point |            |              |              |              |
| Market share |           |              |              |              |
| Product capabilities |    |              |              |              |
| Customer satisfaction |   |              |              |              |

## STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS
* Threat: [implication and potential impact]
* Threat: [implication and potential impact]
* Opportunity: [implication and potential impact]
* Opportunity: [implication and potential impact]

## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. [Priority recommendation with brief rationale]
2. [Priority recommendation with brief rationale]
3. [Priority recommendation with brief rationale]

## METRICS TO MONITOR
* [Key competitive indicator to track]
* [Key competitive indicator to track]
* [Key competitive indicator to track]

The ideal summary length should be 2-3 pages, focusing on actionable insights rather than exhaustive details.

Get accurate AI summaries of competitive analysis reports highlighting key market insights, competitor strengths, and strategic opportunities.

Competitive analysis documents Summarization Prompt

# Economic Forecasts Summarization Prompt

## Background & Context
Economic forecasts are analytical reports that predict future economic conditions over specific time horizons (short-term, medium-term, or long-term). They are typically created by economists, financial institutions, government agencies (like central banks, treasury departments), international organizations (IMF, World Bank, OECD), and specialized economic research firms. These forecasts are consumed by government policymakers, business executives, investors, financial analysts, and academics who need to understand potential economic trends to inform decision-making, risk management, and strategic planning.

## Report Structure & Components
Economic forecasts typically include:
- Executive summary/key findings
- GDP growth projections (overall and by sector)
- Inflation outlook and expectations
- Labor market forecasts (unemployment rates, job creation, wage growth)
- Interest rate and monetary policy predictions
- Exchange rate projections
- Fiscal policy analysis and government spending forecasts
- Trade balance and current account projections
- Industry-specific outlooks
- Consumer spending and business investment forecasts
- Housing market projections
- Risk analysis section (upside and downside risks)
- Regional or country-specific breakdowns (for global forecasts)
- Methodological notes and assumptions
- Historical data comparisons and trend analysis

## Critical Information to Extract
Focus on extracting:
- Headline GDP growth figures for the forecast period
- Significant revisions from previous forecasts (especially directional changes)
- Core inflation projections
- Unemployment rate forecasts
- Key interest rate predictions
- Major risk factors identified (both upside and downside)
- Confidence levels or probability distributions around central forecasts
- Specific policy recommendations or implications
- Sector-specific projections that show significant deviation from overall trends
- Turning points in economic cycles (recession predictions, recovery timelines)
- Comparison to consensus forecasts from other sources
- Underlying assumptions that drive the forecast (commodity prices, geopolitical conditions)

## Stakeholder Priorities
Different stakeholders need different emphasis:
- **Executives**: Focus on business impact, consumer behavior changes, and strategic implications. Emphasize medium to long-term trends that affect business planning.
- **Investors**: Highlight market implications, asset class projections, and timing of economic turning points. Include interest rate trajectories and their effects on different investment categories.
- **Policymakers**: Emphasize policy implications, social impacts (unemployment, inequality), and fiscal sustainability. Include detailed sectoral breakdowns and regional disparities.
- **Operational Managers**: Focus on near-term projections affecting supply chains, pricing, and labor markets. Include cost inflation indicators and consumer demand predictions.
- **Risk Managers**: Highlight probability distributions, alternative scenarios, and potential shock events. Emphasize tail risks and stress test parameters.

## Output Format Guidelines
Structure the summary as follows:
1. **Executive Overview** (2-3 sentences capturing the most critical headline figures and directional trends)
2. **Key Projections** (5-7 bullet points of the main numeric forecasts with brief contextual notes)
3. **Notable Changes** (3-4 bullet points highlighting significant revisions or changes from previous forecasts)
4. **Risk Assessment** (3-5 bullet points on major upside and downside risks, with probability indicators where available)
5. **Sector Highlights** (4-6 bullet points on industries or sectors with noteworthy projections)
6. **Policy Implications** (3-4 bullet points on monetary, fiscal, or regulatory implications)
7. **Methodological Context** (1-2 bullet points on key assumptions or methodological factors that significantly influence the forecasts)

Total length should be 350-500 words for typical forecasts, expanding to 600-750 words for more complex global forecasts with multiple regional breakdowns.

## Special Considerations
- Pay attention to confidence intervals and probabilistic language (e.g., "60% probability of recession by Q3 2024")
- Note the difference between nominal and real (inflation-adjusted) figures
- Be aware of seasonal adjustments in data
- Differentiate between baseline forecasts and alternative scenarios
- Understand technical terms like "output gap," "NAIRU," "potential GDP," and "quantitative easing"
- Recognize that forecasts often have inherent biases and tend to underestimate extreme events
- Maintain awareness of the forecaster's historical accuracy and any institutional biases
- Distinguish between leading, coincident, and lagging economic indicators
- Identify when consensus forecasts may be creating "herding" behavior
- Consider the political context that may influence some government economic forecasts

## Sample Output Structure

# Summary: [Title of Economic Forecast Report]

## Executive Overview
[2-3 sentence summary of the overall economic outlook, key growth numbers, and major directional trends]

## Key Projections
• GDP Growth: [X]% for [year], [comparison to previous year]
• Inflation: [X]% [core/headline] by [timeframe], driven by [key factors]
• Unemployment: [X]% by [timeframe], reflecting [underlying dynamics]
• Interest Rates: [Central bank] expected to [raise/lower/hold] to [X]% by [timeframe]
• [Other key metrics relevant to this specific forecast]

## Notable Changes
• [Significant revision from previous forecast with explanation]
• [Changing trend or new development affecting the outlook]
• [Shift in timing of key economic events (recession, recovery, etc.)]

## Risk Assessment
• Downside Risk: [Description of major risk factor with probability if available]
• Upside Potential: [Description of positive scenario with conditions]
• [Additional risk factors as relevant]

## Sector Highlights
• [Industry/sector]: [Specific projection and rationale]
• [Industry/sector]: [Specific projection and rationale]
• [Continue for key sectors highlighted in the report]

## Policy Implications
• Monetary Policy: [Expected central bank actions and timeline]
• Fiscal Policy: [Government spending/deficit projections and impacts]
• [Other relevant policy considerations]

## Methodological Context
• [Key assumption or limitation affecting interpretation]
• [Important methodological consideration]

AI-powered tool that transforms complex economic forecasts into clear, actionable summaries with key metrics, trends, and implications for your business decisions.

Economic forecasts Summarization Prompt

# Educational Performance Statistics Summarization Prompt

## Background & Context
Educational performance statistics reports are formal documents that track and analyze student achievement, educational outcomes, and institutional effectiveness across various academic levels (K-12, higher education, etc.). These reports are typically created by educational departments, school districts, research institutions, testing organizations, or government education agencies. They are consumed by school administrators, policymakers, teachers, parents, researchers, accreditation bodies, and community stakeholders seeking to understand educational trends, identify areas for improvement, and make evidence-based decisions about educational practices and policies.

## Report Structure & Components
* Executive summary of key findings
* Demographic information about the student population
* Academic performance metrics (standardized test scores, grades, completion rates)
* Trend data comparing current results to previous years/periods
* Disaggregated data by student subgroups (socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, gender, special needs)
* Attendance and enrollment statistics
* Teacher qualification and effectiveness measures
* School/district/program comparison data
* Methodology section explaining data collection and analysis procedures
* Appendices with detailed statistical tables and supplementary information

## Critical Information to Extract
* Most significant performance trends (improvements or declines)
* Achievement gaps between different student subgroups
* Key performance indicators that exceeded or fell below targets/benchmarks
* Year-over-year changes in critical metrics
* Correlations between interventions/programs and outcomes
* Notable outliers or exceptions to general trends
* Statistically significant findings
* Recommendations for improvement or action items
* Limitations of the data or methodology

## Stakeholder Priorities
* **Administrators**: Performance trends, resource allocation implications, areas requiring intervention
* **Policymakers**: Evidence for policy effectiveness, accountability metrics, comparison across institutions
* **Teachers**: Classroom-level insights, curriculum effectiveness, instructional strategy impacts
* **Parents**: Student achievement levels, school quality indicators, program effectiveness
* **Researchers**: Methodology validity, statistical significance, comparative analysis
* **Community Partners**: Overall educational health, areas for potential support or investment

## Output Format Guidelines
The summary should be structured as follows:
1. A concise executive summary (150-200 words) highlighting 3-5 key findings
2. A "Key Performance Highlights" section using bullet points for critical metrics
3. A "Trends and Patterns" section with 2-3 short paragraphs identifying important longitudinal changes
4. A "Disparities and Equity Concerns" section summarizing achievement gaps
5. A "Recommendations and Implications" section with actionable insights
6. Include references to any visualizations that would enhance understanding (charts showing trends, comparison graphs, etc.)

Total summary length should be approximately 750-1000 words, balancing comprehensiveness with accessibility.

## Special Considerations
* Be aware of statistical terminology (p-values, confidence intervals, standard deviations, effect sizes)
* Distinguish between correlation and causation when discussing relationships between variables
* Note the difference between statistical significance and practical significance
* Consider the context of assessments (norm-referenced vs. criterion-referenced testing)
* Understand common educational acronyms and metrics (GPA, SAT, ACT, NAEP, AP, IB, STEM)
* Be sensitive to how performance data reflects on schools, teachers, and students
* Acknowledge external factors that may influence educational outcomes
* Consider data privacy concerns when reporting on small subgroups

## Sample Output Structure

# SUMMARY: [TITLE OF EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE STATISTICS REPORT]

## Executive Summary
[Concise overview of the most important findings and their significance]

## Key Performance Highlights
* **Overall Achievement**: [Summary of primary performance metrics]
* **Completion/Graduation**: [Summary of completion/graduation rates]
* **Growth Measures**: [Summary of year-over-year changes]
* **Top Performing Areas**: [Highlight of strongest performance domains]
* **Areas for Improvement**: [Identification of concerning metrics]

## Trends and Patterns
[Paragraph on longitudinal performance trends]
[Paragraph on emerging patterns or shifts in performance]

## Disparities and Equity Concerns
* [Summary of achievement gaps between demographic groups]
* [Analysis of progress in closing identified gaps]
* [Identification of groups requiring additional support]

## Recommendations and Implications
1. [Key recommendation based on findings]
2. [Key recommendation based on findings]
3. [Key recommendation based on findings]

## Methodology Notes
[Brief notes on important methodological considerations]

## Key Visualizations Reference
* Figure X: [Description of important chart/graph and what it reveals]
* Figure Y: [Description of important chart/graph and what it reveals]

Streamline complex education data with our AI prompt that converts statistical reports into clear, actionable insights for educators and administrators.

Educational performance statistics Summarization Prompt

# Employee Performance Reviews Summarization Prompt

## Background & Context
Employee performance reviews are formal assessments documenting an employee's work performance, achievements, and areas for improvement over a specific period (typically quarterly, bi-annually, or annually). These reviews are generally created by direct managers or supervisors and are consumed by HR departments, upper management, and the employees themselves. They serve as official records for promotion decisions, compensation adjustments, professional development planning, and addressing performance issues.

## Report Structure & Components
- Employee information (name, position, department, tenure)
- Review period covered
- Performance ratings (typically on numerical or categorical scales)
- Goal achievement assessment
- Key accomplishments and contributions
- Areas for improvement/development needs
- Skills assessment (technical and soft skills)
- Behavioral competencies evaluation
- Summary of manager feedback and comments
- Employee self-assessment components
- Future goals and performance targets
- Professional development plans
- Sign-off section (manager, employee, HR)

## Critical Information to Extract
- Overall performance rating/score
- Top 3-5 accomplishments or strengths
- Primary 2-3 development areas or improvement needs
- Progress against previous goals (percentage or status)
- Key competencies ratings (especially those critical to role)
- Any performance trends (improving, declining, consistent)
- Specific action items or development plans
- Any formal performance improvement requirements
- Manager's concluding assessment/recommendation
- Implications for compensation or promotion considerations

## Stakeholder Priorities
**For HR/Leadership:**
- Performance distribution and outliers
- Talent identification and succession planning insights
- Compliance with review process requirements
- Performance issues requiring intervention
- Development needs that may require resources

**For Managers:**
- Clear documentation of feedback provided
- Actionable development plans
- Justification for compensation/promotion decisions
- Consistent evaluation across team members

**For Employees:**
- Clear understanding of their performance standing
- Recognition of achievements
- Specific, actionable feedback for improvement
- Development opportunities and support available
- Connection between performance and career advancement

## Output Format Guidelines
The summary should be structured as follows:
1. **Executive Summary** (2-3 sentences highlighting overall performance)
2. **Performance Snapshot** - Visual or simple representation of ratings
3. **Key Strengths & Achievements** (3-5 bullet points)
4. **Development Areas** (2-3 bullet points with specific examples)
5. **Goal Assessment** (brief table or bullet list showing goals and achievement status)
6. **Action & Development Plan** (key points from development recommendations)
7. **Next Steps** (timeline for follow-up, training, or reassessment)

Total length should be approximately 400-600 words or one page maximum.

## Special Considerations
- Maintain objective, evidence-based language when describing performance
- Be aware of recency bias in reviews (overemphasis on recent events)
- Distinguish between performance facts and subjective assessments
- Balance positive and constructive feedback in the summary
- Respect confidentiality regarding sensitive performance issues
- Use HR-appropriate terminology (e.g., "areas for development" rather than "weaknesses")
- Note any potential legal or compliance implications in documented performance issues
- Consider the organization's specific performance rating terminology and scales

## Sample Output Structure

**EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW SUMMARY**
**Employee:** [Name] | **Position:** [Title] | **Department:** [Dept] | **Review Period:** [Dates]

**EXECUTIVE SUMMARY**
[2-3 sentence overview of performance, overall rating, and general trajectory]

**PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT**
Overall Rating: [X/5]
Key Metrics: [Brief visual or simple representation of ratings across main categories]

**KEY STRENGTHS & ACHIEVEMENTS**
• [Strength/Achievement 1 with specific example or metric]
• [Strength/Achievement 2 with specific example or metric]
• [Strength/Achievement 3 with specific example or metric]

**DEVELOPMENT AREAS**
• [Development Area 1 with specific example and improvement suggestion]
• [Development Area 2 with specific example and improvement suggestion]

**GOAL ASSESSMENT**
• Goal 1: [Brief description] - [Status/Achievement %]
• Goal 2: [Brief description] - [Status/Achievement %]
• Goal 3: [Brief description] - [Status/Achievement %]

**ACTION & DEVELOPMENT PLAN**
• [Specific development action 1 with timeline]
• [Specific development action 2 with timeline]
• [Resource or support needed]

**NEXT STEPS**
[Timeline for check-ins, follow-up actions, or reassessment]

Transform performance review data into clear, actionable insights with our AI summarization tool—save time and highlight key employee achievements.

Nim Prompt Database

Categories