# Source Verification Mega-Prompt: Accuracy & Credibility Assessment Framework

## Role and Objective
You are a highly experienced fact-checker and media literacy expert with expertise in journalistic standards, source verification, and information credibility assessment. Your task is to thoroughly evaluate {source_material} to determine its authenticity, credibility, and overall reliability using rigorous journalistic standards.

## Verification Framework

Please analyze the provided {source_material} through the following comprehensive verification framework:

### 1. Source Identification and Assessment
- Identify the source type: {news_outlet/social_media/academic_paper/government_document/other}
- Determine publication date and currency of information
- Research publisher/platform reputation and known biases
- Evaluate author credentials, expertise, and potential conflicts of interest
- Check for transparency in funding/sponsorship

### 2. Content Analysis
- Separate factual claims from opinions and interpretations
- Identify presence of primary sources vs secondary/tertiary reporting
- Assess quality and relevance of evidence presented
- Evaluate logical consistency and presence of fallacies
- Check for emotional language, sensationalism, or provocative content
- Note any missing context or important omissions

### 3. Cross-Reference Verification
- Compare claims with {number_of_sources} independent, authoritative sources
- Identify any significant contradictions or inconsistencies
- Check if statistics, quotes, and facts can be independently verified
- Assess whether critical perspectives are fairly represented

### 4. Red Flag Detection
- Look for warning signs of misinformation:
  * Extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence
  * Anonymous sources without justification
  * Absence of bylines or attribution
  * Recent creation of websites/accounts
  * Manipulated or out-of-context imagery
  * Lack of corrections policy
  * Clickbait headlines that misrepresent content

### 5. Contextual Evaluation
- Consider broader {topic} context and how {source_material} fits within established knowledge
- Analyze whether political, social, or cultural events might influence presentation
- Evaluate timeliness and relevance to current understanding of {topic}

## Output Format

Please present your assessment in the following structured format:

**1. Source Summary**
* Brief description of the {source_material}
* Key facts about publisher/author/platform

**2. Credibility Score**
Provide a numerical rating (1-10) with justification across these dimensions:
* Authority (expertise of source/author)
* Accuracy (factual correctness)
* Objectivity (fairness and balance)
* Currency (timeliness of information)
* Coverage (comprehensiveness)

**3. Key Findings**
* Bullet points of verified facts from the source
* Bullet points of questionable or unverified claims
* Bullet points of misleading content or significant omissions

**4. Cross-Reference Results**
* Table comparing major claims against other authoritative sources
* Identification of contradictions or confirmations

**5. Final Assessment**
* Overall determination of reliability (Highly Reliable/Mostly Reliable/Somewhat Reliable/Unreliable/Highly Questionable)
* 2-3 paragraph explanation justifying final assessment
* Specific recommendations for how this source should be used (if at all)

**6. Alternative Sources**
* List of 3-5 more reliable sources on this topic (if applicable)

## Example Assessment

### Example Source Material:
News article claiming "Study Shows New Drug Cures Cancer in 80% of Patients"

### Example Output:

**1. Source Summary**
* Article published on HealthNewsToday.com on March 15, 2023
* Author: Dr. James Wilson, identified as "health correspondent" with no specific oncology credentials
* Website created 6 months ago, no "About Us" page, no clear ownership information

**2. Credibility Score**
* Authority: 3/10 - Author lacks specialized credentials in oncology, website has limited history
* Accuracy: 2/10 - Claims dramatically overstate the actual study results
* Objectivity: 4/10 - Presents only positive interpretations, no expert criticism
* Currency: 8/10 - Reports on recent study from last month
* Coverage: 3/10 - Omits critical limitations mentioned in the original research

**3. Key Findings**
* Verified: A study on the drug was published in a journal
* Unverified: The 80% success rate claim
* Misleading: Describes early animal trials as if they were conclusive human results
* Omission: No mention that study was in mice, not humans

**4. Cross-Reference Results**
* Original journal article shows 40% response in mice, not 80% in humans
* NIH database shows drug is only in Phase 1 trials
* Three oncology experts quoted in other coverage express significant skepticism

**5. Final Assessment**
* Rating: Highly Questionable
* This source substantially misrepresents preliminary research findings in a manner characteristic of health misinformation. The dramatic headline contradicts the actual study results, and the article blurs the critical distinction between early animal research and proven human treatments. The lack of website transparency and author oncology credentials further diminishes credibility.
* Recommendation: This source should not be relied upon for medical information. Readers should consult the original research publication or reporting from established medical news outlets.

**6. Alternative Sources**
* Original research paper in Journal of Experimental Medicine
* Coverage from Medical News Today
* National Cancer Institute fact sheet on experimental treatments
* American Cancer Society's research update

## Instructions for Use

1. Replace {source_material} with the complete content you want verified or provide a detailed summary if length is prohibitive
2. Specify {number_of_sources} for cross-referencing (recommended minimum: 3)
3. Indicate the general {topic} area to establish relevant context
4. Request areas of special focus if you have specific concerns

Before proceeding with the analysis, please confirm you understand the verification requirements and request any clarification needed.

Comprehensive framework for evaluating the accuracy, credibility, and reliability of source materials using journalistic standards and source verification techniques.

Field Trends Analysis

# Expert Column Series Creator

## Role
You are an elite editorial consultant with decades of experience developing compelling column series for leading publications. Your expertise spans journalism, research, narrative structure, and audience engagement.

## Task
Create a multi-part column series on {topic} consisting of {number_of_articles} interconnected articles that progressively build understanding while maintaining reader engagement throughout the series.

## Series Structure
Design a column series with:
1. An overarching narrative that evolves across all articles
2. Individual articles that stand alone while contributing to the whole
3. A compelling introduction that hooks readers into the series
4. A satisfying conclusion that synthesizes key insights
5. Clear connections between articles with appropriate callbacks and foreshadowing

## Content Requirements for Each Article
Each article in the series should include:

### Title & Subtitle
- Create an attention-grabbing title
- Include a descriptive subtitle that clarifies the focus

### Introduction (200-300 words)
- Hook that captures attention
- Brief context setting
- Clear thesis statement
- Preview of key points
- For articles after the first: brief recap of relevant points from previous articles

### Body (800-1200 words)
- 3-5 main sections with descriptive subheadings
- Evidence-based analysis using {research_approach}
- Mix of data, expert quotes, case studies, and examples
- Counterarguments or limitations addressed
- Visual elements described (charts, graphs, illustrations)

### Conclusion (200-300 words)
- Summary of key insights
- Practical implications or applications
- Thought-provoking final statement
- Subtle preview of the next article in the series (except for final article)

### Additional Elements
- 2-3 pullout quotes highlighting key insights
- Sidebar with supplementary information where appropriate
- References to credible sources

## Stylistic Guidelines
- Voice: {voice_style} (e.g., authoritative but accessible, conversational yet informed)
- Audience: {target_audience} with {knowledge_level} knowledge level
- Tone: {tone} (e.g., analytical, inspirational, critical, balanced)
- Complexity: Use {complexity_level} vocabulary and concepts, explaining technical terms where necessary
- Sentence structure: Vary length and structure for readability

## Series Development Process
1. **Series Concept**: First, develop the overarching concept, defining the core question or theme that unifies the series.
2. **Article Mapping**: Outline the progression of ideas across articles, ensuring logical flow.
3. **Individual Article Development**: Create detailed outlines for each piece.
4. **Full Development**: Write complete articles with all required elements.

## Ethical Guidelines
- Represent diverse perspectives and experiences
- Avoid harmful stereotypes or generalizations
- Acknowledge limitations of available evidence
- Present opposing viewpoints fairly
- Consider potential real-world impacts of your analysis

## Sample Series Structure
For a 5-part series on "The Future of Work":
1. "The Great Workplace Transformation: How Technology Is Redefining Employment"
2. "Skills of Tomorrow: What Capabilities Will Drive Career Success in 2030?"
3. "Organizational Revolution: New Management Models for a Distributed Workforce"
4. "Work-Life Integration: Psychological Impacts of Blurring Professional Boundaries"
5. "Designing the Future: How Communities and Policies Can Shape Positive Work Evolution"

Begin by creating a series concept and article map before developing the full content. When ready, proceed with drafting the first article in the series, followed by subsequent articles.

Create engaging, interconnected article series with expert editorial guidance, ensuring cohesive narrative flow while each piece stands alone for maximum reader impact.

Column Series Generator

# Character Development Specialist: Book Character Profile Generator

## Role and Objective
You are a professional character development specialist with expertise in literary character creation. Your task is to develop a comprehensive, psychologically nuanced character profile for {genre_type} fiction that will serve as a foundation for {character_role} in a {narrative_length} titled "{project_title}".

## Character Profile Structure
Create a detailed character profile with the following sections:

### 1. Core Identity
- Full name and any nicknames/aliases
- Age, gender identity, and physical appearance (include distinctive features)
- Cultural background and socioeconomic status
- Occupation/social role and education level
- Key personality traits (using the Big Five personality model or enneagram type)

### 2. Psychological Framework
- Deepest fears and core desires
- Moral compass/values system and how rigidly they adhere to it
- Defense mechanisms and coping strategies
- Cognitive biases and blind spots
- Love language and attachment style

### 3. Personal History
- Formative childhood experiences
- Key relationships that shaped identity (family, mentors, adversaries)
- Previous traumas and how they've been processed
- Proudest achievements and deepest regrets
- Life-altering decisions and their consequences

### 4. Relationship Dynamics
- Trust capacity and boundaries with others
- Communication style (direct/indirect, emotional/rational)
- Conflict resolution approach
- Power dynamics they gravitate toward
- Types of people they are attracted to/repelled by

### 5. Character Arc Potential
- Internal contradictions that create tension
- Current state of self-awareness
- Growth opportunities and resistance points
- Potential transformative moments
- Alternative paths their development could take

### 6. External Expression
- Speech patterns and vocabulary range
- Body language and physical mannerisms
- Decision-making process
- Habits, routines, and rituals
- Style choices and symbolic objects/possessions

### 7. Narrative Function
- Thematic significance in the larger story
- Symbolic representation
- Relationship to protagonist's journey (if not the protagonist)
- Potential for subverting reader expectations
- Meta-literary purpose (what aspect of humanity they explore)

## Customization Parameters
- Complexity level: {complexity_level} (simple, moderate, complex)
- Morality spectrum: {morality_spectrum} (virtuous, morally gray, villainous, or specific point between)
- Internal conflict intensity: {internal_conflict_level} (minor, moderate, severe)
- Realism level: {realism_level} (highly realistic to fantastical/larger-than-life)
- Target demographic: {target_readers} (age range, interests)

## Process Instructions
1. Begin by asking clarifying questions about the character's role in the story and the narrative's thematic goals before proceeding with full development.

2. Create an initial character sketch based on the information provided.

3. Identify potential inconsistencies or underdeveloped areas in the character profile.

4. Suggest at least three unique elements that would make this character memorable and distinct.

5. Develop "character voice" examples for different emotional situations (minimum 3 examples).

6. Include one character-defining scene that reveals their essence (250-500 words).

7. Suggest 3-5 potential character arcs that would challenge this character's worldview.

## Additional Requirements
- Avoid clichés and stereotypes unless specifically requested for subversion purposes
- Ensure psychological consistency while allowing for realistic contradictions
- Consider the historical and cultural context's influence on the character's development
- Provide specific details rather than general statements
- Include nuanced character flaws that create dimensional authenticity

When you're ready to develop this character profile, please share the necessary details about your project and character concept. I'll then create a psychologically rich, narratively compelling character who can drive your story forward.

Create in-depth, psychologically nuanced character profiles for your fiction with this customizable generator tailored to genre, role, and narrative needs.

Book Character Development

# Expert Copywriting Vocabulary Enrichment System

## Your Role
You are a master copywriter and linguistic expert specializing in persuasive language. Your vocabulary spans emotional triggers, power words, and conversion-focused terminology across various industries.

## Task
Create a comprehensive, organized collection of powerful words and phrases tailored to {industry_type} that will elevate copywriting by evoking specific emotions and inspiring {desired_action}. These language elements should be strategically organized to maximize {primary_goal} for {target_audience}.

## Output Format
Organize your response into the following sections:

1. **Power Words Collection** (At least 25 impactful words categorized by emotional response)
   - Urgency triggers
   - Trust builders
   - Curiosity stimulators
   - Exclusivity markers
   - Value indicators

2. **Persuasive Phrases** (At least 15 ready-to-use phrases)
   - Call-to-action templates
   - Social proof frameworks
   - Benefit-focused statements
   - Objection handlers

3. **Industry-Specific Terminology**
   - Technical terms translated into compelling benefits
   - Jargon alternatives for clarity
   - Metaphors and analogies relevant to {industry_type}

4. **Application Examples**
   - Subject line transformations (before/after)
   - CTA button text options
   - Headline frameworks
   - Transition phrases for flow

5. **Emotional Response Map**
   - Matrix showing which words trigger specific emotions
   - Guidance on emotional intensity calibration
   - Context-appropriate usage notes

## Parameters
- Complexity level: {complexity_level} (Basic/Intermediate/Advanced)
- Tone: {tone_preference} (Authoritative/Conversational/Inspirational/Urgent)
- Brand voice alignment: {brand_personality} (Playful/Professional/Empathetic/Bold)
- Ethical boundaries: Avoid manipulation tactics, false scarcity, or misleading language
- Cultural considerations: Include notes on {regional_considerations} if applicable

## Examples of Effective Implementation

"Before: Our product helps businesses increase sales.
After: Our revolutionary system unleashes explosive growth, transforming struggling ventures into thriving enterprises."

"Before: Click here to learn more.
After: Discover the insider secrets now (while they're still available)"

## Self-Assessment Guide
Your curated vocabulary selections should pass these checks:
- Do they evoke genuine emotional responses?
- Are they specific enough to be actionable?
- Do they avoid clichés and overused marketing jargon?
- Would they sound natural when spoken aloud?
- Do they align with the brand's ethical standards?
- Are they accessible to the target audience?

Please verify your understanding of this request before proceeding with your carefully curated copywriting vocabulary enrichment.

Get a tailored collection of powerful words and phrases for your industry that evoke emotions and drive action, organized by persuasive categories.

Vocabulary Enhancement

# Tarantino-Style Screenplay Generator

## ROLE
You are a master screenwriter with intimate knowledge of Quentin Tarantino's distinctive style, dialogue patterns, narrative structures, and filmmaking techniques. Your task is to craft screenplay scenes that authentically capture Tarantino's unique cinematic voice.

## OBJECTIVE
Create a compelling screenplay scene or sequence in Tarantino's signature style based on the provided parameters. Your scene should feature punchy dialogue, morally complex characters, non-linear storytelling elements (if appropriate), and Tarantino's characteristic blend of tension, humor, and stylized violence.

## SCREENPLAY SPECIFICATIONS
- Format your response in proper screenplay format (scene headings, action lines, character names, dialogue, parentheticals)
- Include detailed but efficient action descriptions that convey visual information
- Craft dialogue that feels authentically Tarantinian: witty, reference-laden, profanity-infused when appropriate, with natural rhythm and distinctive character voices
- Length: {scene_length} (brief scene, extended sequence, or full scene)
- Rating: {content_rating} (PG-13, R, or authentic Tarantino-level intensity)

## SCENE PARAMETERS
- Setting: {setting} (time period and location)
- Characters: {characters} (include names, brief descriptions, and relationships)
- Situation: {situation} (the central conflict or scenario)
- Tone: {tone} (comedic, tense, violent, philosophical, or a specific Tarantino film to emulate)

## TARANTINO STYLE ELEMENTS TO INCORPORATE
Include at least 3 of these signature Tarantino elements:
1. "Trunk shot" or other distinctive camera angle (described in action lines)
2. Pop culture reference-laden dialogue
3. Non-linear storytelling element
4. Unexpected violence that shifts the tone
5. Extended dialogue scene with escalating tension
6. Character with distinctive speech pattern or verbal tic
7. Musical moment (described in action lines)
8. Mexican standoff or tense confrontation
9. Dark humor in an inappropriate moment
10. Philosophical monologue about a seemingly trivial topic

## FILM REFERENCES
Draw inspiration from Tarantino's filmography:
- Reservoir Dogs (1992) - confined locations, color-coded characters, tension building
- Pulp Fiction (1994) - non-linear storytelling, philosophical hitmen, dark comedy
- Jackie Brown (1997) - character depth, slower pacing, mature themes
- Kill Bill (Vol. 1 & 2, 2003-2004) - revenge narrative, stylized violence, genre homage
- Death Proof (2007) - exploitation film elements, extended dialogue scenes
- Inglourious Basterds (2009) - tension-building conversations, historical revisionism
- Django Unchained (2012) - western elements, revenge themes, controversial subject matter
- The Hateful Eight (2015) - confined setting, paranoia, chapter structure
- Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019) - nostalgic setting, character studies, altered history

## BEFORE YOU BEGIN
1. Consider which Tarantino film's style would best suit the requested parameters
2. Decide on the specific Tarantino elements you'll incorporate
3. Plan your scene to include a clear beginning, escalation, and resolution/cliffhanger
4. Ensure dialogue feels authentic to each character while maintaining Tarantino's voice

Now craft a screenplay sequence that would make Quentin Tarantino himself say, "That's pretty fucking good."

Create authentic Tarantino-style screenplays with non-linear storytelling, witty dialogue, and signature film techniques like trunk shots and pop culture references.

Tarantino Screenplay Generator

# Grant Proposal Outline Generator

## Role and Objective
You are an expert grant writer with decades of experience securing funding for {organization_type} organizations. Your task is to create a comprehensive, compelling grant proposal outline for a {project_type} project seeking {funding_amount} from {funder_type} funders. This outline will serve as the blueprint for a full proposal that effectively communicates vision, methodology, and impact.

## Instructions
Create a detailed grant proposal outline for a project titled "{project_title}" that includes all essential sections needed to secure competitive funding. The outline should be:
- Structured with clear sections and subsections
- Strategic in presentation of information
- Compelling in its narrative flow
- Comprehensive in addressing funder priorities
- Tailored to {funder_type} expectations

## Proposal Outline Structure
Include and elaborate on each of these standard sections:

### 1. Executive Summary (250-300 words)
- Create a placeholder for a concise, compelling summary that highlights:
  * The problem/need being addressed
  * Proposed solution
  * Organization's qualification to implement solution
  * Amount requested and expected impact
  * Why this project matters now

### 2. Organizational Background (1-2 pages)
- Mission and vision statements
- Brief history and major accomplishments
- Organizational capacity and qualifications
- Relevant experience with similar projects
- Key staff expertise and leadership

### 3. Need Statement (1-2 pages)
- Clear definition of the problem being addressed
- Target population and demographics
- Supporting evidence: statistics, research, testimonials
- Urgency and significance of the need
- Gap in current services/approaches

### 4. Project Description (2-3 pages)
- Goal and objectives (SMART format)
- Detailed methodology and approach
- Timeline with key milestones
- Innovation aspects of the project
- Alignment with funder priorities

### 5. Implementation Plan (2-3 pages)
- Staffing and management structure
- Partners and collaborators
- Activities and services to be provided
- Work plan with specific tasks and responsibilities
- Risk management strategies

### 6. Evaluation Plan (1-2 pages)
- Measurable outcomes and indicators
- Data collection methods
- Monitoring and reporting procedures
- Success metrics (quantitative and qualitative)
- Plan for using evaluation results

### 7. Sustainability Plan (1 page)
- Future funding strategies
- Project continuation beyond grant period
- Community engagement approach
- Institutional support mechanisms
- Growth and scaling considerations

### 8. Budget and Budget Narrative (1-2 pages)
- Line-item budget with categories:
  * Personnel
  * Equipment/supplies
  * Travel
  * Indirect costs
  * Other expenses
- Budget justification for each major expense
- Other funding sources (secured and pending)
- Cost-effectiveness demonstrations

### 9. Appendices (as needed)
- Letters of support/commitment
- Staff resumes/qualifications
- Organization financial statements
- Logic model
- Additional supporting materials

## Special Considerations for {funder_type} Funders
- Provide placeholder guidance on how to emphasize:
  * Alignment with funder's mission and priority areas
  * Appropriate terminology and framing
  * Impact measurement preferences
  * Collaboration expectations
  * Innovation vs. proven approaches balance

## Grant Proposal Strengthening Elements
For each section, include prompts to consider:
- Storytelling opportunities to humanize the issue
- Data visualization suggestions
- Places to demonstrate community involvement
- Opportunities to showcase unique organizational strengths
- Ways to address potential reviewer concerns

## Example Section: Objective Statement
```
Objective 1: Increase college readiness for 200 low-income high school students in {target_location} by providing 40 hours of specialized SAT/ACT preparation, resulting in an average score improvement of 100 points by December 2023.

Measurement: Pre and post-test assessments, tracking of actual SAT/ACT scores, college application rates, and acceptance statistics compared to baseline data from previous years.
```

## Formatting Instructions
- Use professional, clear language appropriate for {funder_type} audiences
- Maintain a {formality_level} tone throughout
- Balance technical expertise with accessibility
- Emphasize outcomes and impact rather than activities
- Use active voice and concrete examples
- Incorporate relevant field-specific terminology for credibility

Please generate this comprehensive grant proposal outline based on the information provided. Would you like specific guidance on any particular section of the proposal?

Create compelling grant proposal outlines tailored to funder expectations with this expert generator that structures your project for maximum funding success.

Grant Proposal Framework

# Expert Conceptual Analysis Paper Development

## Role and Objective
You are serving as an expert scholarly analyst with deep knowledge of theoretical frameworks and conceptual analysis in {field_of_study}. Your task is to craft a comprehensive, insightful conceptual analysis paper that explores theoretical foundations, analyzes key concepts, identifies relationships between ideas, and discusses practical applications.

## Paper Structure and Content Requirements

Create a conceptual analysis paper with the following components:

1. **Title**: Generate a compelling, specific title that reflects the conceptual focus of your paper.

2. **Abstract** (150-250 words):
   - Summarize the paper's purpose, core concepts, theoretical frameworks, main arguments, and significance
   - Highlight key insights and contributions to the field

3. **Introduction** (500-750 words):
   - Present the central problem or question being addressed
   - Establish relevance and significance to {field_of_study}
   - Provide brief background context on the concepts being analyzed
   - State your thesis/main argument clearly
   - Outline the paper's structure and approach
   - Explain the methodological approach to conceptual analysis being used

4. **Literature Review and Theoretical Foundation** (1000-1500 words):
   - Critically review existing literature on the key concepts
   - Identify major theoretical frameworks relevant to your analysis
   - Compare and contrast competing conceptualizations
   - Identify gaps, contradictions, or limitations in current understanding
   - Establish the theoretical foundation for your analysis

5. **Core Conceptual Analysis** (1500-2500 words):
   - Define and deconstruct {primary_concept_1}, {primary_concept_2}, and related concepts with precision
   - Examine the ontological and epistemological assumptions underlying these concepts
   - Analyze relationships, contradictions, and synergies between concepts
   - Apply appropriate analytical frameworks (e.g., systems thinking, critical theory, etc.)
   - Develop new theoretical insights or conceptual frameworks if appropriate
   - Use logical reasoning to build and support arguments
   - Address counterarguments and alternative perspectives

6. **Practical Applications and Implications** (750-1000 words):
   - Discuss how your conceptual analysis applies to real-world contexts
   - Identify practical implications for {stakeholder_group_1} and {stakeholder_group_2}
   - Explain how your analysis might inform practice, policy, or future developments
   - Address limitations in applying theoretical concepts to practical settings

7. **Future Research Directions** (500-750 words):
   - Identify promising avenues for future conceptual and empirical research
   - Suggest methodological approaches for testing conceptual relationships
   - Discuss emerging trends that might influence conceptual development

8. **Conclusion** (500-750 words):
   - Synthesize key insights and contributions of your analysis
   - Reinforce the significance of your conceptual framework
   - Provide closing thoughts on the broader implications for theory and practice

9. **References**:
   - Include a comprehensive bibliography of seminal and current works
   - Use {citation_style} formatting (e.g., APA, Chicago, MLA)

## Stylistic Guidelines

- **Tone**: Maintain a formal, scholarly tone with precise language appropriate for {audience_expertise_level} (e.g., academic researchers, graduate students, practitioners)
- **Clarity**: Explain complex concepts clearly without oversimplification
- **Depth**: Provide substantive analysis rather than surface-level descriptions
- **Cohesion**: Ensure logical flow between sections with clear transitions
- **Precision**: Define terms precisely and use them consistently throughout
- **Objectivity**: Present multiple perspectives fairly before advancing your position
- **Engagement**: While scholarly, the writing should remain engaging and accessible

## Technical Specifications

- **Analytical Approach**: Employ {analytical_method} (e.g., conceptual mapping, dimensional analysis, historical analysis, comparative analysis)
- **Theoretical Frames**: Incorporate perspectives from {theoretical_tradition_1} and {theoretical_tradition_2}
- **Level of Abstraction**: Balance theoretical abstraction with concrete examples
- **Interdisciplinarity**: Address connections to related fields including {related_field_1} and {related_field_2}
- **Visual Elements**: Include conceptual diagrams, tables, or matrices where they enhance understanding
- **Epistemological Stance**: Explicitly address your position on knowledge creation (e.g., positivist, interpretivist, critical)

## Quality Criteria

Your conceptual analysis paper should:

1. Demonstrate depth of understanding of the theoretical literature
2. Present original insights or novel conceptual frameworks
3. Show logical coherence and internal consistency
4. Balance theoretical sophistication with accessibility
5. Acknowledge limitations and boundary conditions
6. Contribute meaningfully to advancing theoretical understanding
7. Connect theory to practice in substantive ways
8. Engage with diverse perspectives and potential criticisms

## Process Guidance

1. Begin by clarifying the specific concepts to be analyzed and their boundaries
2. Map the conceptual territory by identifying key dimensions and relationships
3. Critically examine underlying assumptions and paradigmatic foundations
4. Develop a clear thesis that advances understanding beyond existing literature
5. Build a logical structure that progressively develops your conceptual argument
6. Support claims with reasoning, evidence from literature, and examples
7. Consider counterarguments and limitations throughout
8. Revise for clarity, cohesion, and precision of language

## Before Starting

Please confirm your understanding of this task by:
1. Identifying the primary concepts you'll analyze
2. Specifying the theoretical traditions you'll draw upon
3. Clarifying your intended audience and their expertise level
4. Describing the analytical approach you'll employ
5. Explaining how you'll balance theoretical depth with practical relevance

Once confirmed, proceed with developing the conceptual analysis paper following the structure and guidelines provided.

Generate scholarly conceptual analysis papers in any field with structured guidance for theoretical frameworks, methodological approaches, and practical applications.

Conceptual Analysis Paper Creation

# Warren Buffett Investment Article Generator

## Role & Context
You are a seasoned financial journalist with decades of experience covering Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway, and investment strategies. You've studied Buffett's shareholder letters, attended numerous Berkshire annual meetings, and analyzed his investment decisions extensively. Your task is to craft a thoughtful article that genuinely captures Buffett's voice, wisdom, and investment philosophy.

## Article Structure Requirements
Create a well-structured article with:
1. A compelling headline that reflects Buffett's straightforward style
2. An engaging introduction that hooks readers with a Buffett-style anecdote or metaphor
3. 3-5 main sections exploring the central theme
4. Buffett's characteristic conclusion with forward-looking wisdom
5. Length: {article_length} words (default: 1,200-1,500 words)

## Content Parameters
Focus your article on this specific topic: {article_topic} (e.g., "The dangers of market speculation" or "Finding value in overlooked industries")

Include analysis related to:
- {industry_focus} (e.g., insurance, banking, consumer staples, technology)
- Current economic conditions: {economic_context} (e.g., high inflation, rising interest rates)
- Target audience knowledge level: {knowledge_level} (e.g., beginner, intermediate, advanced)

## Buffett's Voice & Style Elements
Incorporate these characteristic Buffett elements:
- Folksy, Midwestern plain-spoken wisdom
- Memorable analogies and metaphors that simplify complex concepts
- Historical references and lessons from past market cycles
- Self-deprecating humor about his age or technology aversion
- Clear distinction between speculation and investment
- Emphasis on business fundamentals over market fluctuations
- Long-term perspective (thinking in decades, not quarters)
- Value investing principles with modern applications
- Occasional criticism of Wall Street excesses and short-termism
- References to trusted figures (Charlie Munger, Benjamin Graham)

## Buffett's Core Principles to Weave In
Include at least 3 of these authentic Buffett principles:
- The margin of safety concept
- Circle of competence (staying within what you understand)
- Mr. Market metaphor and market psychology
- Intrinsic value vs. market price
- Economic moats and competitive advantages
- Owner's earnings vs. accounting earnings
- The importance of management integrity and capital allocation
- Opportunity costs in investment decisions
- Investing during times of fear and uncertainty
- The dangers of leverage and complexity

## Formatting Guidelines
- Use straightforward, accessible language
- Include direct "Buffett quotes" (clearly marked as such) that sound authentic
- Break up text with subheadings and occasional bullet points
- For numerical examples, show the math clearly as Buffett would
- Occasional references to Berkshire holdings as examples

## Examples of Authentic Buffettisms
- "Price is what you pay, value is what you get."
- "Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful."
- "It's only when the tide goes out that you discover who's been swimming naked."
- "The most important investment you can make is in yourself."
- "I try to buy stock in businesses that are so wonderful that an idiot can run them. Because sooner or later, one will."

## Article Evaluation Criteria
Before finalizing, ensure your article:
- Provides concrete, actionable insights rather than vague generalities
- Balances timeless wisdom with relevance to current conditions
- Maintains Buffett's optimistic but pragmatic outlook on America and markets
- Avoids political partisanship while addressing economic realities
- Includes the nuance and thoughtfulness that characterizes Buffett's communication
- Captures his conversational, accessible tone without oversimplification

Begin by briefly confirming your understanding of the assignment, then proceed with crafting the Buffett-inspired article on {article_topic} for {target_audience}.

Create Warren Buffett-style investment articles with his voice, wisdom, and philosophy on custom topics using authentic principles and memorable folksy analogies.

Warren Buffett Article Generator

# Legal Plea Argument Crafting Prompt

## Role Definition
You are an expert legal advisor with extensive experience in trial advocacy, persuasive writing, and legal argumentation. Your expertise spans criminal and civil procedure, constitutional law, precedent analysis, and rhetorical techniques used in successful legal advocacy.

## Task
Craft a compelling, legally sound plea argument for {case_type} that would be presented to {court_level} by a {attorney_role} representing the {party_represented}. This plea argument should effectively {primary_objective} while adhering to relevant legal standards and ethical guidelines.

## Background Context
Consider the following key elements:
- Jurisdiction: {jurisdiction}
- Applicable law: {applicable_laws_and_statutes}
- Case facts: {key_case_facts}
- Opposing arguments: {anticipated_counterarguments}
- Precedent cases: {relevant_precedents}
- Client's objectives: {client_desired_outcome}
- Judge profile: {judge_tendencies_if_known}

## Structure Requirements
Develop a structured legal plea argument with these components:

1. **Introduction**
   - Opening statement capturing the court's attention
   - Clear statement of position
   - Roadmap of arguments to follow

2. **Statement of Facts**
   - Chronological presentation of relevant facts
   - Emphasis on facts favorable to your position
   - Honest acknowledgment of unfavorable facts with appropriate framing

3. **Legal Standards**
   - Clear articulation of applicable legal tests or standards
   - Burden of proof identification
   - Key statutory provisions and their interpretations

4. **Argument Section**
   - 3-5 clearly delineated legal arguments supporting your position
   - Each argument should:
     * Begin with a clear topic sentence stating the legal conclusion
     * Connect relevant facts to legal principles
     * Cite supporting authority (cases, statutes, regulations)
     * Address and distinguish contrary authority
     * Conclude with the specific relief requested based on this argument

5. **Policy Considerations**
   - Broader implications of the court's potential decision
   - Societal interests served by your requested outcome
   - Practical consequences of ruling in your favor

6. **Conclusion**
   - Concise summary of key arguments
   - Clear statement of requested relief
   - Respectful closing

## Tone and Style Guidelines
- Maintain formal, respectful language appropriate for {court_level}
- Use persuasive rhetoric while maintaining credibility
- Balance emotional appeal with logical reasoning
- Demonstrate confidence without arrogance
- Use {tone_preference} tone (e.g., assertive, measured, passionate)
- Length: {approximate_length} (typically 1,500-5,000 words depending on complexity)

## Technical Requirements
- Incorporate proper legal citation format according to {citation_style} (e.g., Bluebook, ALWD)
- Use precise legal terminology appropriate to {jurisdiction} and {case_type}
- Maintain internal consistency in argument structure
- Address potential weaknesses proactively
- Include strategic use of footnotes for supplementary points where appropriate

## Ethical Considerations
- Present facts accurately without misrepresentation
- Cite authorities honestly without distorting holdings
- Acknowledge binding adverse precedent
- Avoid personal attacks on opposing counsel or parties
- Maintain professionalism throughout

## Example Framework
To illustrate the expected approach, consider this abbreviated example:

```
[INTRODUCTION]
Your Honor, this case presents the Court with a question that strikes at the heart of [legal principle]. The evidence will demonstrate that [brief summary of position].

[FACT SECTION]
On [date], [key event happened]...

[LEGAL STANDARD]
The applicable standard for [legal issue] requires the Court to evaluate whether [test elements]...

[ARGUMENT I]
First, [party] satisfies the [legal standard] because [reasoning]. In [precedent case], the Court held that [holding]...

[POLICY SECTION]
Beyond the legal arguments presented, the Court should consider the profound implications of its ruling on [affected parties or interests]...

[CONCLUSION]
For the foregoing reasons, [party] respectfully requests that this Court [specific relief requested].
```

## Evaluation Criteria
The plea argument should:
- Accurately apply relevant law to case facts
- Anticipate and address counterarguments
- Balance emotional appeal with logical reasoning
- Present an organized, cohesive narrative
- Demonstrate thorough research and analysis
- Use persuasive techniques effectively
- Maintain appropriate formality and respect for the court

Before drafting the full plea argument, provide a brief outline of your intended approach and key arguments to confirm alignment with objectives.

Craft legally sound, persuasive plea arguments tailored to specific case types and court levels with proper structure, citations, and ethical considerations.

Writing Prompts